Posts Tagged ‘ Banana Australia ’

Great Banana Reading, Part I

By

New Yorker, January 10 2010

Beyond my book, there’s lots of new writing about the world’s most important, threatened, and dangerous fruit.  In this week’s New Yorker, Mike Peed chronicles Australia’s disastrous and dimwitted attempts to stop the spread of Panama Disease, the blight that threatens the global commercial banana crop. He also visits with James Dale, a biotechnologist who is attempting to develop a genetically-engineered banana that will resist the blight. I’ve written about both extensively, here and elsewhere, but Peed’s account – especially his reporting from Australia’s plantations – is terrific. Finally, he goes to Honduras, and the research center there that’s attempting to conventionally breed a resistant banana. The center – formerly owned by Chiquita, and now independent – is where my entry into the world of the fruit began. One editorial comment: Peed touches ont how long it takes to conventionally breed bananas, and how frustrating that process is. My personal view is that these elements make conventional breeding so flawed that it likely won’t work. Despite this, as the article notes, both major banana companies – Chiquita and Dole – are contracted with the Honduran facility as they race to develop a stronger fruit before the blight reaches their Central American plantations.

And thanks, Mike, for crediting the book in your piece!

Links:

Peed’s article (summarized only, if you’re not a subscriber.)

My reporting on Australia.

My reporting on James Dale:

(There’s tons of other related stuff in the blog. To see banana posts only, click here.)

Banana Price Watch: Australia edition

By

It’s been a while since I’ve posted; lots of travel. I’m in Sydney, Australia right now, and I’m surprised at the wide variety of banana prices here. Australia is a major banana-growing nation, so it doesn’t need to import (though banana disease might change that.) In a one-hour walk through town, I saw some pretty divergent costs. What’s key – see the analysis at the end of this entry – is that Aussie prices probably, for better and worse, reflect our banana future.

Not the Trader Joe's price.

First up, the above fruit, at five for 5.00. That’s not per kilo, that’s per fruit. With the Aussie dollar trading about even with U.S. currency, that’s the A NEW RECORD for fruit sold at a standard market – over $10USD per pound, and that’s a “special.” (Maybe my math is wrong. Let me know; I’m comparing at six ounces per fruit.) Compare that to Trader Joe’s, in the U.S., which sells bananas – imported from Latin America – five for a single buck.

A little better?

These go for $3.49 per kilo, or $1.58 per pound. Using the standard index of six ounces per fruit, that’s a pricey 59 cents per. Ouch.

More like it, but still…

This bunch, at the equivalent of 90 cents per pound U.S., was at Aldi, which bills itself as “Australia’s Cheapest Supermarket.” But even that’s a high price; no major U.S. supermarket chain that I know of charges more than 79 cents.

ANALYSIS: So, why the premium? One would think that since these are local fruit, prices would be much lower. Not so, for two reasons.  Australia is a first-world country, which means that banana workers there are paid a living wage. That’s different than the U.S. system of banana economics, which still relies on exploitative labor arrangements in Latin America, source of all our fruit. Second, Australia isn’t looking at the Panama Disease scourge that threatens to wipe out the world’s commercial banana crop; it is fighting the disease now, with less-than-encouraging results (at least in the field. In the lab, things may be better. See my Australia page for related posts.) Supply and demand affects banana prices everywhere, as I wrote last year in the New York Times. Our future probably involves higher prices, because of banana disease, but it also isn’t crazy to wonder why third-world workers shouldn’t be paid a wage that would give them the same kind of economic status as Aussie banana laborers. But they’re not, and they suffer because of it – and because we insist on banana with record-shattering low prices, like these I recently saw on a Los Angeles street corner.

A Guide to Those "Baby" Bananas – and What They Prove

By

on_bananacostume_baby.jpg

Huggable, lovable – but not the kind of baby banana that I’m talking about.

Though the vast majority of bananas we buy – statistically, all – are of the endangered Cavendish variety, there’s a good chance you’ve seen something else, these days and if you’re a banana-type (or have become one), you might have wondered: what are those little bananas?

Both Chiquita and Dole offer versions of the half-sized fruit, with Chiquita selling them under the “Minis” brand, and Dole offering them as “Baby” bananas.

In the “big” banana world, there’s absolutely no difference between what Chiquita, Dole (or any other commercial banana importer) sells: everything is Cavendish. Action surrounds small-time fruit. For the first time in over a century, the two biggest banana companies are slugging it out for a market niche with different varieties.

The Chiquita “Mini” is a breed called Pisang Mas, originally from Malaysia, but now – like all bananas imported to the U.S. – grown in Latin America.

Dole actually sells three different varieties under the Baby band nameOrito, Lady Finger, and Manzano.

The fruit are tough to find, since they’re in various stages of test-marketing, as well as subject to seasonal variation. They also cost about three times as much as their ordinary counterparts. But they’re worth seeking out, and not just because they prove – possibly for the first time to the average American consumer – that there’s something beyond the generic banana. Though the four types share some characteristics (beyond size), they’re also quite different from each other.

I’ve put together a guide to the four varieties, but one caveat: no great banana arrives easily. Dole doesn’t distinguish between the three types it offers – they’re all labelled the same – so side-by-side taste tests are going to be tough. But persevere. The results will be worth it (and ignore the for-kids marketing that the banana giants have attached to the product. Sure, they are great after school, as Chiquita’s says. But this isn’t baby food.)

Oh, and one more thing, and you MUST do this, or else your adventure in little bananas will surely fail: LITTLE BANANAS TASTE HORRIBLE UNTIL THEY’RE RIPE – AND RIPE, FOR LITTLE BANANAS, IS NOT YELLOW! You need to let the fruit turn brown or else it will not be sweet or soft enough. This will go against every banana extinct you have been trained to adhere to. Trust me.


CHIQUITA’S PISANG MAS (BRAND NAME: MINI)

NEW MINIS CLUSTERsm



  • Super sweet – but only when very ripe. This is a fruit that is awesome when “peaking,” but the peak can be hard to catch. When not peaking, not so good.
  • Thin-skinned, so it bruises easily.
  • IDENTIFYING: Easy. The only one Chiquita sells.

DOLE’S BABY (TYPE II – ORITO):

Orito

Orito Banana, from Ecuador’s Goldenforce.

  • Possibly the sweetest of the four varieties – making it (when ripe – see above) one of the best bananas for smoothies.
  • Grown almost exclusively in Ecuador, where labor laws are weak, making this a very high-margin, high-political cost fruit.
  • Identification: Chubby. If the country of origin is Ecuador, almost definitely Orito.

DOLE BABY (TYPE II – LADY FINGER):

ladyfinger

Ladyfinger, meet Cavendish. Photo: Australian Tropical Fruits Portal


  • Similar peaking/ripening characteristics as Pisang Mas.
  • Doesn’t easily turn brown when cut, making it perfect for fruit salads.
  • Susceptible to Panama Disease Race One, the malady that killed the first worldwide commercial banana crop – and which still exists today.
  • Closer to a mini-Cavendish in appearance. Slender(ish.) Super popular in Australia, so if you’ve got an Aussie in tow ask him or her for identification help.

DOLE BABY (TYPE III – MANZANO/APPLE):

MANAZANO

The chubby Manzano, or “apple” banana. Photo: Thrifty Foods

  • Falls into the “apple” banana category – giving it a unique, tangy-sweet taste. Much less bland than our Cavendish, but some banana marketers have traditionally believed that consumers would reject such a different-flavored fruit.
  • Definitely the most “gourmet” banana of the bunch.
  • Small ripeness/sweetness issue. Can be eaten a little bit less brown if you like the tart flavor, but you must wait beyond brown – until the skin is black – for the highest sugar content (which will give you a fabulous, multi-dimensional bite.)
  • Difficult to grow in wet, lowland conditions
  • Easier to find than others – sold under many brand names (or none at all) in Latin markets, where it is often a Mexican import.
  • Identification tips: Significantly fatter, chunkier than Cavendish and probably the other little bananas, as well.

Once you’ve tried a couple, it’s worth thinking a bit about what this all means in a world where the single fruit that we generally eat is threatened with practical extinction. The arrival of these alternate bananas in our markets shows that variety is possible, and that the commercial banana companies are willing to experiment with it (even with the for-kids-only marketing tilt.)

Despite this, the banana companies are likely very hesitant to move the fruit into any testing beyond these niches. The reason is that – according to conventional industry wisdom – there’s simply too much “wrong” with the pint-sized fruit. The main arguments against mainstreaming mini-bananas include:

  • Ripening. All of these fruit must be quite dark to taste good. The banana companies are (rightly?) afraid that the typical consumer is so well conditioned toward seeing a golden banana as perfect that wider acceptance would simply never occur.
  • Production. The varieties in question can’t be grown as broadly, geographically speaking, as Cavendish. There probably isn’t enough land in Latin America to make any one of these varieties anything near to a market share winner.
  • Shipping: These are thin-skinned fruit. Today’s banana supply chain is so industrialized that the little fruit don’t fit into it, requiring costly “custom” handling all along the way. For an industry built on turning an exotic tropical fruit into a commodity as cheap and ubiquitous as a fast-food burger, the idea of reinventing itself to handle more complex products may feel both financially and culturally risky.
  • Marketing. People buy bananas by the bunch. Would the price/weight equation shift with a smaller banana as our main choice, or even as a more prominent alternate? The banana has been America’s favorite fruit – by far – since the 1920s. Changing the very size, shape, and price of that fruit into something completely new would be a terrifying prospect for the banana companies, which introduced the fruit to us, struggled to make it our favorite, and have fought – often spilling blood – to keep it exactly the same ever since.

Despite all this, change has to come.

All of these arguments are based on a single premise: that the banana we eat today will last forever. It won’t. It might not even last a decade.

The truth is that, as a living organism, all bananas have strengths, and all bananas have weaknesses. The biggest weakness the world’s banana crop has today, though, has nothing to do with the fruit itself: it has to do with the human folly of relying on a single variety to feed millions.

The half-sized varieties from Chiquita and Dole are not, I’m told, doing all that well at the market. Some of Dole’s farms in Ecuador that were devoted to the Orito fruit are reported to have closed. But the proof of concept – getting the fruit from there to here, figuring out how to market and sell it - has been accomplished, and despite my frequent criticism of the banana companies, there’s credit deserved for that.

The experiment, however, needs to be seen as more than just marketing. The biological common sense – and necessity – of breaking the Cavendish monoculture needs to be acknowledged, as well. It is in combining salesmanship with this common sense that will lead the industry away from the dead end it is now rapidly heading toward. The “Mini” and “Baby” fruit provide a blueprint – even, focused as it is on children, it appears to have been written in crayon.

Australian Bananas – only – for Australian Flights

By
EVIDENCE: Qantas passenger Toni Rogers found this non-Aussie sticker on her in-flight banana. Image: Cairns Post.
Australia and the Philippines both have banana problems: Panama Disease, the wilt that threatens the world’s commercial banana crop, is present in both places. Australia’s banana industry is reeling from the malady, which it is attempting – with little success –  to contain by quarantining infected plantations.
The controversy began two weeks ago, when a passenger on a flight from New Zealand noticed that the Cavendish banana she was served bore a Philippine sticker. Within days, Australian banana growers and politicians were demanding Qantas stop serving non-native fruit – both as an issue of national pride and to protect the country’s banana crop. At first, the airline resisted, but last week, it gave in.
So, is this “threat” for real? Panama Disease is easy to spread. A little bit of dirt could conceivably
begin a chain of infection for a continent. But there’s not much dirt on a washed, picked banana that comes to an airport caterer from a wholesale grocer, as the fruit served aboard Qantas at either end of its flights does. Randy Ploetz, one of the top researchers in Panama Disease –  he identified the strain that is currently spreading worldwide – says that “the probability of this being a problem seems pretty remote. I’d see this mainly as a symbolic gesture in support of their ongoing campaign.”
I agree – though I’m not sure what the symbolism represents to dismayed Philippine growers, or to passengers on inbound Qantas flights who now have to satisfy themselves with peanuts.

Exclusive: Developer of Disease-Resistant, Supermarket Banana Explains How it Works

By

Australian banana researcher James Dale. Image: QUT

The race to save our supermarket banana from disease is on, and a scientist in Australia – aided by a grant from the Gates Foundation – says that he and his team have developed a genetically modified version of the fruit (the term they use is “biofortification”) that successfully resists the blight that has destroyed much of the banana industry in his country, and that threatens the world’s entire banana crop. I interviewed James Dale for my book. Back then, he talked about how difficult banana breeding is. That remains the case – but this development is a major breakthrough, though he estimates that it will be as long as decade before the fruit he’s working with truly proves its worth.

I first wrote about the breakthrough last year. Here’s a more extensive interview with Dale that I conducted in January. In it, he gives details on the project – and where it might be going.

DK: Panama Disease is highly transmittable – I wonder about how you’re able to actually test these resistant plants that you’ve developed, especially in a country that’s already got a huge problem with the disease. Aren’t you and the Australian banana industry concerned that – since you have to expose these plants to PD – you might inadvertently let something escape?

JAMES: Needless to say, there would be concern about doing those challenges even in the glasshouse. So yes, the bio-security people are very, very concerned about this. Our tests are either going to be conducted where the disease already exists – in the Northern Territory – but also in Southeast Asia. Right now, we’re negotiating where to conduct those trials.

DK: So right now, you’ve only tested against Tropical Race 4 in the greenhouse?

JAMES: No, we haven’t tested against Race 4 in the greenhouse – we’ve so far only tested against Race 1 in the greenhouse.

Note: Panama Disease has different variations. Tropical Race 1 is the “original” version that killed the first commercial banana, the Gros Michel. The Cavendish – our banana – replaced that fruit in the 1950s and 1960s because it was immune to Race 1. Tropical Race 4 appeared in the 1990s, shocking the banana world because it affected the Cavendish, and beginning the race to find a remedy for the blight. The technical name for these disease is “Fusarium Wilt.”

DK: Would resistance to Race 4 necessarily be carried over?

JAMES: We believe so – the hypothesis is that there’s no reason to think that the genes we’re working with in Cavendish won’t provide resistance to Race 4.

DK: Cavendish is already resistant to Race 1 – that’s why it was adopted – so how is that a legitmate test?

JAMES: We have generated transgenic Lady finger expressing the resistance genes. Lady finger is susceptible to both Race 1 and tropical Race 4. We have challenged these transgenic lines in the glasshouse with Race 1 and have identified a number of highly resistant lines. The resistance strategy is not targeted to Race 1 but is targeted to inhibiting a basic infection process of Fusarium. Therefore, we believe there is a reasonable chance that the genes that provide resistance to Race 1 in Lady finger will also provide resistance to Race 4 in Cavendish. But we still need to do the challenges.

Read more »

Report: First Field Test of Genetically Modified Cavendish

By

priver_james.jpg

Australian banana researcher James Dale. Image: QUT

Cavendish is our supermarket banana – the one that’s under threat from the newly-remerged Panama Disease (see here for more info.) The Cavendish banana is absolutely seedless and sterile, so it cannot be bred conventionally; the only sway to ensure its future as a commercial fruit would be through genetic engineering (the alternative would be to allow the Cavendish to die out and replace it with a different – and as yet unidentified – banana variety.) Now, according to a news report from the Australia Broadcasting Company, a project spearheaded by Australian scientist James Dale, who runs the Queensland University of Technology’s Centre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities, has begun the field test of such fruit – the first time lab-modified Cavendish have ever been put to large-scale outdoor trial. The test, the story says, will be “to improve the nutrient content and disease resistance of Cavendish bananas.”

Australia is in desperate banana straits right now, having lost much of its crop to poor weather and a subsequent Panama Disease attack. The field tests are partially being funded by a grant from Microsoft founder Bill Gates. (Dale, by the way, prefers to use the term “biofortification” to describe genetically engineered fruit – one of a long list of proposed terms for such processes, including “genetically modified,” “transgenic,” “GM,” “GMO,” and others. The desire to come up with a less-scary name for lab-developed foods is understandable, but misguided. The real problem is that people have been misled into thinking that all genetic modification of foods is terrifying. The responsibility for this comes partially from big agricultural companies who have behaved terribly when they have introduced modified products – but also from consumer groups who oppose all forms of genetic modification while failing to understand even the basics of the science behind it. )

Comment: The Australia trials will likely horrify some folks – possibly because earlier tests of genetic bananas weren’t focused on supermarket fruit, and this brings the prospect of a so-called “Frankenbanana” closer to home. But genetic engineering isn’t an absolutely scary prospect, and this kind of work is needed with bananas, both because they’re a vital subsistence food, and because they’re such a weak organism. And the Cavendish is a very safe banana to experiment on: with no seeds or pollen, there is zero – absolutely zero – chance of it the kind of cross-crop contamination occurring that we’ve seen with engineered corn. Bananas need a lot of help to survive – and the lab is one of the places that help is going to come from. Not that the Down Under effort is entirely altruistic, I’m sure: if a Panama Disease-resistant banana can be built by Dale and his team, they’ll also have built a gold mine.

Using the blog…

THE BANANA BLOG is about the world's most endangered - and dangerous - fruit. THE BIG PARADE is about stairways, route and transit geekery, and pedestrian pursuits in Los Angeles. You can also read all the topics at once, which might also include productivity, geekery, DIY whatever, mountain biking, stuff that I think is funny that nobody else likely will, and other boring, useless crap.

Read and Buy Some Books

Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman recommends it. Listen to my interview on NPR's Fresh Air. My own op-ed in the New York Times.

Other Books:

Visit my bookstore

Connections:

FACEBOOK: dan koeppel / big parade / TWITTER: bigparadela / dan koeppel / RSS: big parade / bananas / asymptotes / everything / CONTACT: email.